All Self-Rate Grievances shall be filed against the player and/or captain by a team captain, league coordinator, or by a member of the championships committee. The 2011 Protocol for Filing a Self-Rate Grievance should assist you in determining if there is enough evidence to proceed with this complaint.
COMPLAINT FILED BY:
___Captain ____Coordinator ___ Committee
Name:
Address:
City, ST Zip:
Phone:
Email:
Date: ____/____/____
COMPLAINT AGAINST:
Name:
Address:
City, State, Zip:
Self-Rating:
Team #:
Phone:
Email:
Captain’s Name:
Captain’s Phone:
Captain’s Email:
DESCRIPTION OF COMPLAINT (Be specific and to the point.)
Return this Self-Rate Grievance Complaint as directed by your State Association.
NTRP Grievance Protocol
Any league captain, coordinator or member of a championship committee has the right to file a NTRP Grievance against a player and/or captain. The grievance will claim that the player and/or captain committed or condoned obtaining a Self Rate or possess a rating which is at a lower NTRP level but has demonstrated the ability to compete at a higher NTRP level.
League administrators are not required to accept such filings unless the specific claims within the grievance meet certain conditions. The items listed below suggest a framework for administrators to use to judge the admissibility of such filings.
Conditions Which Must Be Present:
1. The Grievance must be against a player of the following rating types: This list includes S, M, T, Dynamic Early Start League and Medical type ratings. A player with a valid NTRP Computer (C) or Benchmark (B) rating or granted Automatic Appeal rating of a "C" is not subject to a NTRP Grievance.
2. The complaint must state that the player has self-rated or possesses a rating which is too low and may also include information that a team captain or other person conspired to obtain that incorrect rating.
3. Factual information including the player’s history that can be validated.
Conditions Which Would Give Credibility to a NTRP Grievance:
• The player participated on a college team at a significant NCAA level (note: age of player, injuries, position on team, and strength of tennis team at particular school could affect a significant change in rating over time).
• The player participated at the professional level (including tennis or other sports).
• The player has earned international, national, sectional or state/district rankings that would reflect a strong probability that the player should have a higher rating.
• The player has ratings equivalent to national or sectional in some other country.
• The player has a history in league tennis and/or sanctioned tournaments that would substantiate a claim that the player has misrepresented their current skill level.
• The player may have produced one or more strikes in her/his current player record. (An administrator should review match results within TennisLink for determination.)
• There is credible written or online documentation that the player answered falsely or omitted information while obtaining a Self Rate.
Contentions or claims that would not, on their own, be accepted as evidence in a NTRP Grievance. However, several of these, presented with additional tennis specific information that clearly suggests a pattern of abuse, may be grounds for filing a NTRP Grievance:
• I haven’t lost a match all year and he beat me like a drum!
• My player is at the top of his level and the opponent beat him easily!
• That player is a teaching pro!
• This player won all his matches by a significant margin in straight sets!
• My player is very strong and was beaten 6-0, 6-0!