tsts

email_us_left_rail_box_85x40 staff_directory_left_rail_box_85x40
contact_us_left_rail_box_85x40 top_jr_tournaments_left_rail_box_85x40
join_jr_team_left_rail_box_85x40 join_adult_team_left_rail_box_85x40
ntrp_tournaments_left_rail_box_85x40 age_level_tournaments_left_rail_box_85x40
search_in_tennislink
jr_tournaments_left_rail_box_85x40 jr_rankings_left_rail_box_85x40
find_jtt_left_rail_box_85x40 adult_rankings_left_rail_box_85x40
usta_league_left_rail_box_85x40 adult_tournaments_left_rail_box_85x40
 
facebook_60x47instagram_60x47_16twitter_60x47

tennislink_left_rail_180x65
 
TW_Logo_1019_180
 
USTAS_en_Espanol_18
 
 

Tennis Elbow Research - The Truth Behind the Pain

April 4, 2005 11:52 AM

By Jim Brown, Ph.D., Executive Editor, Sports Performance Journal (athletesperformance.com)

Which is more effective in the treatment of tennis elbow: cortisone injections, physical therapy, or a wait-and-see approach? Researchers at a university in Amsterdam assigned 185 patients to one of three groups corresponding with the three strategies. They measured variables such as pain, disability, and patient satisfaction after 3, 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks.

After six weeks, those who had received cortisone shots reported more success than the other two groups, but the recurrence of pain and disability was high. Long-term treatment with physical therapy proved to be more effective than injections. At the end of a year, the success rates were 91 percent for physical therapy, 83 percent for the wait-and-see approach, and 69 percent for injections.

The investigators concluded that the treatment of choice might depend on personal factors and available resources. The report appeared in the British medical journal, Lancet.

© 2004 HMS Publishing, Inc.
Jim Brown will be contributing new content to this site on a monthly basis. If you have a question for Dr. Brown please feel free to email him at
sportsmed@mindspring.com.

 

Back

 


Print Article Email Article Newsletter Signup Share
 
Newsletter Signup
USTA Shop
 
 
 
 
Close